子机构
400-600-1123
logo
备考资讯 提分课程 答疑社区
登录
注册
题库解析   >   观点对比型 题型   >   RC1-3篇
本题由lindy提供
RC1-3篇

Ecoefficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in ecoefficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today's global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more ecoefficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less ecoefficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on ecoefficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

The primary purpose of the passage is to

    A.explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once     

    B.propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage

    C.present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy

    D.make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced

    E.suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy

登录申友雷哥GMAT,查看答案及解析

视频解析

暂无视频解析,点击获取更多视频内容

文字解析

答案:
C
主旨题,该
文主旨是提出着重生态效益的一种后果 A错误,文中没有提及生态效益不那么成功的内容; B错误,文中未提及另一种替代策略; C正确,文中作者提出了单纯强调生态效益会带来适得其反的后果; D错误,文中未谈及“更大的层面”; E错误,文章作者主要谈及的是“生态效应”而并非“经济效应”;

GMAT会员

提交
OG视频
申友雷哥GMAT小助手

添加官方小助手微信
了解更多GMAT考试与咨询

100蜜糖购买当前课程

当前蜜糖数:颗 去获取

立即购买 取消购买

吉祥物小蜜蜂

关注公众号

公众号

扫码关注申友雷哥GMAT公众号

立即获取12GGMAT核心资料

微信咨询

申友在线咨询二维码图片

扫码添加申友雷哥GMAT官方助手

立即咨询GMAT网课面授课程

联系申友雷哥 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282